Thanks to Affes Statistik Blog for all the hard work in putting the analysis of Sweden’s staggering and shocking rape statistics together.
The Swedish government want to hide accurate and up to date statistics from the public with clear intent of social engineering. Therefore, only figures from 1985-1989 and 1995-2001 could be used for comparison. The current rape statistics are likely much higher today, as has been proven in similar cases in Norway. These crimes mainly refer to Muslim migrants who are extremely over-represented in nearly all of the 77.6% migrant based rapes. These figures do not include Muslims who possess Swedish citizenship, and may be mixed under “Swedish rapes”.
Who are the guilty people for bringing in these crimes into the country? Responsible criminal ministers, both then and now, have been informed and are social engineering specialists: Thomas Bodström (s), Beatrice Ask (m), Mona Sahlin (s), Erik Ullenhag (fp), Barbro Holmberg (s), Tobias Billström (m) and others.
There need to be criminal charges brought against these Swedish ministers who have become guilty of social engineering and growing rape crimes against it’s citizens. The ministers have to be considered charged under guilt to Assaulted Rape through Guilt by Association, Joint Liability, Conspiracy and Treason.
When I have “rape” in the title will increase visits to your blog dramatically. Rape upset, and rightly so, that’s a disgusting crime which affects both women and men in depth. If a connection is made to immigrants over the presentation of rape crimes, it becomes very explosive. What we know of course our rulers and authorities. Therefore, they do everything for us in the dark. It is rarely direct lies. It would be too risky. Effective propaganda is all about creating uncertainty. Insecure people are passive.
One way to create uncertainty is failing to investigate and find out the facts. Or, as in this case: facts and findings are available, but they are not released to the public.
The only major study that has been made regarding immigrants overrepresented in rape where the results became public, the investigation is in BRÅ-rapport 1996:2, which covers the years 1985-1989.
Here I have started from the report’s estimate in Table 24 (p. 74). The pie chart on the right you can see that even then (1985-1989) were persons of Swedish background in the minority of 39 percent.
These things I have counted on the 2011 conditions, see the chart at the top of the post. People of Swedish descent account for 22.4 percent. The reason that Swedes have such a high percentage is that I have taken account of the new sexual offenses law which came 2005th Without it, the Swedes percentage was mindre.1 Non folkbokfördas percentage I have made known to remain at 10 percent. It may be a conservative estimate. Increased the percentage would of course Swedes percentage decrease.
Who exactly are committing these rapes?
The BRÅ report from 1996 reported over-representation of immigrants of different types of crime are divided on which countries / geographical areas, people came from. According to the National Council is the data set for including rape too thin (p. 61):
“As for murder, manslaughter, rape, other sexual offenses, robbery and burglary are the values of brottsparticipation too small to be able to draw conclusions from them.”
Rape figures for the years 1985-1989 was on a completely different level than today. Broken down by individual countries, the material becomes even thinner. It is possible to draw some conclusions, but to draw any firm conclusions needed more data.
Nearly ten years later in 2005 will follow up report. Instead of more data so we can start to draw conclusions do we make this announcement (p. 44):
“BRÅ’s last study was done fairly detailed analysis of the foreign-born and ‘immigrants’ children’ over-representation of each crime divided on which countries / geographical areas, people came from. BRÅ has this time decided that such a detailed analysis is not meaningful.”
I can agree with. BRÅ’s “analysis” is rarely meaningful. However, a detailed account of the results desired.
It is not that BRÅ did not bother to produce values for the countries of origin. They have obviously taken up all the results. It is after they have seen the results, they judge that there is “meaningful” to account for them. In other words, do the investigators on the BRÅ just how it is with the immigrants’ countries of origin for various categories of crime. Responsible ministers, both then and now, of course have been informed. Thomas Bodström (s), Beatrice Ask (m), Mona Sahlin (s), Erik Ullenhag (fp), Barbro Holmberg (s), Tobias Billström (m) and others.
The Liberal Party’s spokesman on refugee and integration issues Mauricio Rojas wrote on DN-debate a few days before the report was released in 2005:
“The sensitive issue, the report explains the concern probably also the slow process of publication of the report presented on Wednesday. The main statistical results have been calculated and analyzed for a long time, but the report’s publication has been delayed because new investigations and treatments deemed necessary depending on the substance of controversial nature.”
One who “examined” the material was a Polish former surveyors … * cough *
Among all the “treatments” was therefore to simply delete all the results of the criminal suspects’ countries of origin in relation to specific types of crime such as rape. An apparent cover-up. More than 2000 individual amounts reported in the first report is missing from “monitoring”.
BRÅ chooses words to conceal results they obtain in their investigations. Studies of the Swedish people pay through their taxes. To get an idea, we simply use the values that emerged from the first report. It is certainly old numbers, but for the sake, they need not be misleading. Mauricio Rojas met with investigators nearly a year before the 2005 publication of the report:
“Last spring, I met two of those responsible for the report generation, among them the late January Ahlberg, who was also author of the report from 1996. It was a meeting that bore witness to a real nervousness that the publication of the new report led in some environments.
During the call, Ahlberg noted that the new report’s findings essentially confirmed the results of the previous report.”
If the new report’s findings essentially confirmed the findings of the previous report, the old figures to be pretty reliable.
Below(2), an evaluation for 2011 based on the information in BRÅ-report 1996:2 Table 2.3 (p. 107).
For the three columns that stand out: Rest of Europe, West Asia and Africa, it is to some extent that they represent large groups of immigrant population. But that’s not the whole explanation. The foreign born from Africa, for example, only 1500 more in population than the foreign born from Europe (yes, you read that right. In the age group 15-54 is the foreign-born Africans are more than the foreign-born from the Nordic countries). Although both groups are almost equal populations are held in Africa is much higher than that of the Nordic countries. It depends on Africans’ over-representation.
For Western Asia, it is mainly Iraq who pulls up the stack. The Iraqis are a major group in Sweden, and they happen to have the second highest over-representation of rape. Only North Africa has a higher value.
Could it possibly have been the result of this style as investigators on National Council came up with 2005? Results confirmed the initial report and made it possible to begin to draw conclusions. The conclusions, if they had been published, might have made people react. Reactions that might have made immigration a matter of choice in parliamentary elections a year later.
This we may never know, but one thing we know for certain: Survey results are available, but they are not released to the public.
An account of how I did the estimates can be found here.
1. Since I took into account changes in sexual offenses Act 2005 I came across more rapes in the Swedish group. A large part of the “Swedish” rape is therefore of less severe kind. The change in legislation was formulated as ‘sexual coercion’ than rape.
2. All the charts I post in this topic is about estimates. Even those from BRÅ. No one has or will ever be fully cognizant of how crime is distributed. Simply because all crimes are not solved. The number of crimes in the bars is very accurate because I have chosen to convert percentages to the number of crimes, to make things a bit more substantial.
========= ========= ========= =========
Other posts in the same series (in Swedish language)
Immigrants and crime 1 – All offenses
Immigrants and the breaks 2 – “WOG majority”
Immigrants and the crimes 3 – East Asian redress
Immigrants and the crimes 4 – Hiram improves statistics
Immigrants and the crimes 5 – Rape
Data Sources and links (in Swedish language)
BRÅ-Report 1996:2 “of immigrants and immigrants’ children’s Crime”
BRÅ-report 2005:17 “Criminality among persons born in Sweden and abroad.”
BRÅ-Report 2000:6 “Young people who rob people”
Foreign or Swedish background (fine structure), the entire kingdom, after the age of ten classes and gender. In 2002-2011
Population Demographics 1999 Part 3
Post-war immigration and emigration
Statistics on reported crime